

I call on the Supreme Court to uphold the First Amendment and strike down this unconstitutional law.” California’s coercive law does not simply restrict these centers’ speech, it fundamentally alters it – in turn violating the centers’ constitutionally protected conscience rights. But under AB 775, these organizations – many of which are religious nonprofits – would be compelled to advertise the very abortions that they are morally opposed to. I am proud to stand with my colleagues in defense of unborn children.”ĭaines said: “Pro-life pregnancy centers play a critical role in providing life-affirming support to pregnant women facing difficult pregnancy decisions. Forcing an individual or private entity to act in a manner that conflicts with their religious beliefs directly contradicts our nation’s core values. The Reproductive FACT Act clearly violates the Constitutional freedom of speech and freedom of religion guaranteed to all Americans. Harris said: “California’s continued attack on the sanctity of life and complete disregard for the First Amendment can no longer go unchecked.

We’re sending a message to the Supreme Court that they must set a precedent by not allowing liberal elites to bully anyone into sacrificing their constitutionally protected freedoms.” That’s exactly what’s happening here, and it’s wrong. No person or entity can be required by the government to say or promote ideas they do not believe. The sole mission of many of these pregnancy centers is to help foster life, not to advertise abortions. LaMalfa said: “The very nature of the Reproductive FACT Act is a blatant violation of the First Amendment, and is representative of the moral degradation of California’s state government.
Congressman andy harris free#
The Court will consider whether the disclosures required by the FACT Act violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment. It also requires non-medically licensed centers to note, in multiple languages, that they do not have a medical provider on staff. The case challenges a California state law, the Reproductive FACT Act (AB 775), which requires licensed medical centers that offer free, pro-life help to pregnant women to post written advertisements promoting the availability of free or low cost abortions subsidized by the state. (R-MD), and Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) issued the following statement after filing an Amicus Curiae brief on behalf of 128 members of the House of Representatives and 16 Senators in support of free speech for pro-life pregnancy centers in the Supreme Court case National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. We deserve better.(Washington, DC) – Congressman Doug LaMalfa (R-Richvale), Congressman Andy Harris, M.D. Harris has placed his congressional district on the record as standing in opposition to these entirely uncontroversial and fundamentally decent positions. And a congressman from Maryland voting against the health and vitality of the Chesapeake Bay should be laughable. An American congressman unwilling to acknowledge ethnic cleansing ought to be inconceivable.
